Wednesday, March 11, 2026

How many hard problems are really waiting for better search, not just bigger models?

How many hard problems are really waiting for better search, not just bigger models? 

The question has become a serious discussion in AI research recently. The AlphaEvolve Ramsey result is a good example of the “better search” paradigm, which is quite different from scaling neural networks.

Let’s unpack it.


1. Bigger models vs better search

In modern AI there are two broad strategies:

Bigger models

Train massive neural networks with more data and compute.

Examples:

  • GPT‑4

  • Gemini

These work well for:

  • language

  • perception

  • coding

  • reasoning approximations

But they don’t directly explore large discrete spaces.


Better search

Instead of predicting answers, the system explores possibilities and verifies them.

Famous examples:

  • AlphaGo used Monte Carlo tree search

  • AlphaFold searched structure space

  • AlphaEvolve searches mathematical constructions

Here the AI:

  1. Generates candidate solutions

  2. Evaluates them with strict rules

  3. Iteratively improves them

This is closer to scientific discovery than prediction.


2. Yes — the Ramsey improvement was a search breakthrough

The improvement to Ramsey bounds was not because of a larger neural network.

It happened because the system could:

  • explore enormous graph spaces

  • mutate structures intelligently

  • keep partial improvements

This falls into Combinatorics, where many problems are essentially search over huge spaces.

So the quote you saw is quite accurate.

Many hard problems are like:

“The solution exists somewhere in a gigantic space of possibilities.”


3. Fields where better search may unlock breakthroughs

These areas are widely believed to be ripe for AI-guided search.


Extremal combinatorics

Area of:

  • Extremal Combinatorics

Problems often ask:

What is the largest structure avoiding some pattern?

Examples likely to improve:

  • Ramsey numbers

  • TurĂ¡n-type graph problems

  • hypergraph constructions

These are perfect for evolutionary search.


Coding theory

Field:

  • Coding Theory

Goal: find codes with best error-correcting properties.

Historically many codes were discovered by clever search.

AI could find:

  • new record-breaking codes

  • improved storage systems

  • better satellite communication schemes


Materials science

Huge design space for molecules and crystals.

AlphaFold already showed the power of AI in biology.

Next targets include:

  • superconductors

  • catalysts

  • battery materials

These are essentially search in chemical configuration space.


Algorithms

AI could discover new algorithms.

Some early examples already happened with:

  • AlphaTensor

AlphaTensor discovered faster matrix multiplication algorithms for certain sizes.

That shocked many mathematicians.


4. Why search is suddenly becoming powerful

Three changes happened recently:

Massive compute

We can evaluate billions of candidates.

Hybrid AI systems

Neural networks guide the search.

Fast verification

Computers can instantly check if a candidate is valid.

That combination is extremely powerful.


5. Problems people think AI search may solve next

Researchers often mention:

Small Ramsey numbers

Especially:

  • Ramsey number R(6,6) bounds

  • hypergraph Ramsey numbers


Sphere packing variations

Related to:

  • Sphere Packing Problem

New constructions might appear.


New error-correcting codes

Important for:

  • deep space communication

  • storage systems

  • quantum computing


Circuit optimization

Finding minimal circuits for cryptographic operations.

Huge search space.


6. About SolveAll.org

Yes — SolveAll has been discussed in the AI research community.

The idea behind it is roughly:

Build AI systems specifically designed to attack unsolved scientific and mathematical problems.

Their philosophy aligns with the search paradigm:

  • structured problem databases

  • automated conjecture generation

  • algorithmic exploration

  • verification loops

It’s similar in spirit to projects like:

  • Lean

  • Coq

but aimed at problem-solving pipelines rather than proof verification.

The general concept is gaining traction because of results like:

  • AlphaFold (biology)

  • AlphaTensor (algorithms)

  • AlphaEvolve (combinatorics)


7. The deeper idea: “scientific search engines”

Some researchers think future AI systems will look like:

generate hypothesis
→ test
→ refine
→ repeat

This mirrors the scientific method.

Instead of asking AI for answers, we ask it to explore possibility space.


8. A provocative prediction

Many scientists now think the first major math breakthrough by AI will not be a proof like the:

  • Riemann Hypothesis

Instead it will likely be something like:

  • discovering a new combinatorial construction

  • finding new algorithms

  • optimizing structures humans overlooked

Exactly the type of problem that better search excels at.


The key insight from that quote

Some problems are hard because:

  • we don’t understand them

But many are hard simply because:

The search space is enormous and humans can only explore tiny parts of it.

AI is beginning to change that.


If you're interested, I can also show you 5 famous open problems that are almost purely search problems (and therefore extremely likely to fall to AI in the next 10–20 years). They’re fascinating because they look deceptively simple.

No comments: