Where TPUs outperform GPUs

 

1) TPUs are specialized ASICs for tensor math

A GPU is a general-purpose parallel processor originally built for graphics, then adapted for AI workloads. It has:

• Many cores

• Cache hierarchies

• A flexible ISA

By contrast, a TPU is a domain-specific ASIC designed only for matrix math and tensor operations — the heart of deep learning. That specialization lets Google engineers eliminate general-purpose circuitry and overhead that AI doesn’t need. GeeksforGeeks

Result: more compute directly tied to neural workloads, not legacy features like rendering units or flexible branching logic.

---

🚀 2) TPUs maximize throughput for dense matrix operations

DNNs like transformers are basically huge, repeated matrix-multiply + accumulate computations. TPUs use:

• Systolic array MAC units optimized for regular tensor flows

• Huge internal SRAM and on-chip buffers

• High-bandwidth memory tightly coupled to compute

Whereas GPUs:

• Have higher peak FLOPs in some configurations

• But rely on caches and dynamic scheduling

TPUs or TPU pods tend to win on sustained throughput per watt for large, regular tensor workloads — especially in inference and large batch training. GeeksforGeeks+1

---

⚡ 3) TPUs often deliver better performance per watt and performance per dollar

Because TPUs do only tensor work:

• They consume less power per operation

• They scale efficiently in clusters (TPU Pods)

• You pay for just the ML compute you use, not extra GPU hardware that sits idle for AI tasks

Benchmarks and analyses have found:

• TPUs can offer multiple× performance per watt over GPUs on large transformer training/inference

• TPU clusters (thousands of chips) can deliver >40 exaflops of equivalent compute in optimized workloads, far more than typical GPU clusters of similar cost. Wevolver

---

🧮 4) Compilers like XLA extract more efficiency

One advantage often mentioned in Substack/technical discussions is compilation vs interpretation:

• TPU workloads are compiled ahead of time (via XLA), so they can be laid out in hardware very efficiently.

• GPUs, even with Tensor Cores, still rely on a programmed execution model with instruction dispatch and caches.

This means that once a TPU program is compiled, its compute and dataflow can be extremely predictable and hardware-optimized. In many tests TPUs outperformed comparable GPUs by 10×, 20×, or more in throughput for large models — once compilation overhead is amortized over many steps. LinkedIn

---

📊 5) Real hardware characteristics matter

Some hardware and architectural reasons TPUs often look better on linear algebra workloads:

Feature	TPU	GPU
Compute units tuned to dense MAC	Yes	Yes (but mixed use)
Systolic array dataflow	Yes	No (general cores + tensor cores)
Low-latency on-chip memory	Yes	Yes, but less specialized
Peak HBM bandwidth	Very high	High
Energy efficiency (FLOPs/W)	Very high	Lower
Flexibility / programmability	Limited	Very high
Compiled from multiple hardware comparisons GeeksforGeeks+1

---

🧩 6) But it’s not universally “better”

There are caveats that often get mentioned (and I’d expect the Substack author to cover these too):

🔹 Short runs or experimental models

TPUs require an upfront XLA compilation step — expensive for short experiments — whereas GPUs can just start running kernels. LinkedIn

🔹 Framework and ecosystem

GPUs run everywhere with native PyTorch, CUDA, TensorRT, etc. — TPUs historically favored TensorFlow, though compatibility is improving. Reuters

🔹 Dynamic models

Models with dynamic control flow, custom ops, or unpredictable compute patterns often run better on GPUs because of their general-purpose flexibility.

---

🧠 In short

📌 TPUs do better than GPUs on large, regular, dense transformer workloads because they are:

• ASICs optimized for deep learning tensor math

• Able to convert high-level models into highly efficient hardware pipelines

• More energy-efficient and scalable for massive matrix workloads

• Tuned for throughput-oriented training and inference

📌 GPUs are still:

• More flexible across workloads

• Better supported in the broader ecosystem

• Easier to prototype on without compilation overhead

So the TPU-wins-in-specific-workloads narrative is real — but it’s a workload and system-dependent advantage, not a blanket superiority. GeeksforGeeks+1